Ecan6 - you're creating your own definition of poverty that doesn't tally with either of the statistics from the USA or Philippines. The Philippine govnt reform act put the poverty threshold at enough per day to cover subsistence ie basic food, clothing, housing. If you want a better education, toys for children, savings etc you need income above that poverty level. You could give to the local church but you would be a large percentage of your disposable income.
The US definition of relative poverty means that even those in the 15% of the population below that level can have a decent amount of disposable income because the average standard of living is much higher. There's also govnt services that add value to income (though this is somewhat offset by different tax rates in different countries) A better gauge of poverty is the percentage of income spent on basic foodstuffs as this also gives an idea of ppd, purchasing power per dollar.
I'm not arguing with your broader point of why other countries should or shouldn't contribute and if there really is a need for all those new KH's. I agree that the org uses the U.S. & others to bankroll its plans around the world. All I'm pointing out is that your poverty statistics aren't equatable and so can't make the point you want them to make.